Getting slapped with a driving under the influence (DUI) or driving while intoxicated (DWI) charge can be highly distressing. Minnesota’s strong commitment to road safety is evident in its severe penalties that underscore the importance of responsible driving. However, these penalties also come with a high standard of proof that can raise your chances of acquittal.
The prosecution must establish that you drove under the influence beyond a reasonable doubt. Jurors require compelling evidence. To challenge your case and avoid conviction, you can cast doubt on the evidence’s validity.
Strategies to explore
Understanding DUI law is crucial for identifying weaknesses in the prosecution’s case. Some of the strategies that you can explore to highlight those weak points include:
- Identifying procedural violations: You can demonstrate unlawful elements of the traffic stop or arrest, like breaks in the chain of custody or a lack of probable cause.
- Questioning field sobriety test results: You can argue that law enforcement did not conduct your field sobriety test correctly or that factors such as medical or environmental conditions skewed the results.
- Challenging chemical test accuracy: You can question the reliability of your breathalyzer or blood test results by raising concerns about improper calibration, equipment maintenance or procedural errors in handling your test samples.
- Highlighting inconsistent testimony: You can point out discrepancies between the arresting officer’s and witnesses’ statements.
- Providing alternative explanations for behavior: You can offer valid reasons, like fatigue and stress, for behaviors seen as signs of intoxication, such as slurred speech or balance issues. Alternatively, you can cite behavior consistent with sobriety to counter a claim.
A strong defense is one tailored to your case. Consulting a DUI defense attorney is advisable to strengthen your defense arguments and ensure a favorable outcome.
